Studio Phantastica

Information

Welcome to the wonderful world of Studio Phantastica. This space represents the culmination of five and a half years of my doctoral research into the spatialities and space-making practices of contemporary psychedelic-assisted therapy.

As a living extension of the research-creation practices that inform my exegesis, this website functions as a tool for space-makers, professional designers, everyday designers, spatial thinkers, psychonauts, and therapy providers. Whether you are a formally trained architect or an everyday space-maker, this platform is for anyone actively engaged in shaping environments for psychedelic care.

When you explore the main page, you will encounter a series of floating fields of colour. These are what I call 'offerings for practice' - critical orientations that have emerged through my research as deeply important ideas for space-making. Representing my core contribution to design practice, these offerings are intended to provoke new ways of thinking about the spaces and spatial practices associated with psychedelic-assisted therapy. By clicking on each offering, a pop-up box will reveal its central provocation.

Mapped across these fluid offerings is a radial dial of sixteen distinct projects, illustrating the fullness of the creative outcomes generated over the course of this work. Each number opens into a specific undertaking, taking you to a project page that contains more information about its context, timing, and execution, along with the photographs, sketches, and writings produced along the way.

This interface can be navigated in multiple ways. You can explore projects directly through the dial, or click on specific offerings to see their directly associated projects rendered in colour. Alternatively, you can navigate using the three design approaches located on the top navigation ribbon. These approaches act as frameworks for engaging with the offerings and projects:

Practice

This approach asks how your design practice itself can become inherently psychedelic, moving across different perceptual registers while navigating the practical realities of our work.

Sites

This approach explores where design might actively intervene within the psychedelic-assisted therapy assemblage and across the psychedelic surround to support the therapeutic encounter.

Materials

This is an approach to designing that asks us to rethink our assumptions about the physical world, treating the materiality of space-making as a vibrant, precarious ecology that actively participates in the therapeutic experience.

These offerings, design approaches, project outcomes, and creative practices are intended to sit alongside the central concept developed during my PhD research: the psychedelic surround. I developed this term to articulate the field of multi-temporal and multi-sited spatial conditions that emerge alongside the psychedelic-assisted therapy encounter (Conrick, 2026, p. 8). Reading these elements together expands our understanding of what is both designed and designable within the context of contemporary psychedelic-assisted therapy.

Thank you for taking the time to explore my work.

Projects

01

Collected Comforts

02

Caritas Christi

03

Sinking/Feeling

04

Scrim

05

Doing Research Together

06

PsiConnect

07

Experiments in Walking

08

Dermographies

09

PSIKEA: Extending the Sensorium

10

Impressions

11

Asanapy

12

The In-between

13

Swinburne

14

Encountering Atmospheric Elements

15

The Tomorrow Party

16

Tanglework

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Sinking/Feeling, image 1 of 7 1/7
Sinking/Feeling, image 2 of 7 2/7
Sinking/Feeling, image 3 of 7 3/7
Sinking/Feeling, image 4 of 7 4/7
Sinking/Feeling, image 5 of 7 5/7
Sinking/Feeling, image 6 of 7 6/7
Sinking/Feeling, image 7 of 7 7/7

Sinking/Feeling

This series of soft improvisations was a direct response to the writing of Sara Ahmed in Queer Feelings and the Cultural Politics of Emotion (2004), where she explores the spatial realities of comfort:

"But comfort is about the fit between body and object: my comfortable chair may be awkward for you, with your differently shaped body. Comfort is about an encounter between more than one body, which is the promise of a ‘sinking’ feeling. It is, after all, pain or discomfort that return one’s attention to the surfaces of the body as body... To be comfortable is to be so at ease with one’s environment that it is hard to distinguish where one’s body ends and the world begins. One fits, and by fitting, the surfaces of bodies disappear from view. The disappearance of the surface is instructive: in feelings of comfort, bodies extend into spaces, and spaces extend into bodies. The sinking feeling involves a seamless space, or a space where you can’t see the ‘stitches’ between bodies."

I wanted to understand how this 'fit' actually feels when we get up close to the surfaces of the flesh. And so, I began a multi-week process of ad-hoc assemblage, where I would bind everyday objects to my body, using them as makeshift prosthetics to test what happens when and where they meet. I strapped the waxy rind of a lemon directly to my skin with rubber cords, feeling the slow, warm exhalation of citrus scent as it absorbed my body heat. I worked on drawings with my hand obscured by a vellum sheet at my studio desk. As the afternoon sun striped the desk, my hand, and the vellum, I moved through the drawing process with only the ghostly facsimile of a hand apparent. I spread my fingers out wide - sweaty, too warm, and itchy inside the unlined polyester embrace of a knobbly green microfibre duster glove - entwining them through unmown, overgrown grass. I rested my head against a wall, buffered by the bounce of a balloon.

At times, when the experiment felt good, I was able to sit with these objects long enough to let them leave a temporary elastic imprint on my skin. And through this time spent, I came to understand that comfort can be read through a sensitivity to trace. Forgetting the body is what allows these traces to form; when an environment accommodates the physical form so completely that the boundaries of the flesh dissolve from consciousness, the resulting physical mark becomes the tangible proof of a seamless meeting.

By using various attachment mechanisms to bypass the labour of holding, my attention was drawn directly (through its absence) to the physicality and durational quality of holding itself. During these experiments, I created supports to make the act of holding easier. In its absence, the labour of holding became a central focus for me. These experiments brought to the surface dual ways of thinking with comfort: what actually happens to the body when we hold or rest for a long time, and what structures and materials are making this durational connection possible? Rather than resolving into a seamless erasure of the body, these experiments magnified the operational friction of the physical encounter, leaving me wondering: In P-AT environments, whose bodies are being held, and whose bodies actually need holding?

How might one practice with an orientation toward holding?

Soft improvisation

2021

Library

Janfamily, "Plans for Other Days"

Plans for Other Days by the London-based art collective JanFamily is a brilliant catalogue of performative, playful, and wonderfully absurd everyday experimentations that completely re-imagine how a body might interact with the mundane objects surrounding it.

When I was figuring out how to physically test Sara Ahmed's concepts of "fit" for the Sinking/Feeling project, this book gave me permission to get weird. Jan Family's quirky, ad-hoc approach to the body encouraged me to look to the world around me, to my intimate everyday environments to find a place to begin experimenting.

Sara Ahmed, "Queer Feelings and the Cultural Politics of Emotion"

In the chapter "Queer Feelings" from The Cultural Politics of Emotion, Sara Ahmed frames comfort as an alignment between bodies and the spaces that accommodate them. When a body fits effortlessly into an environment, its surfaces disappear from view, allowing a person to sink seamlessly into the world. Discomfort, she notes, is a generative disorientation that returns our acute attention directly to the edges of the flesh.

This framing of the "fit" became the primary theoretical anchor for the durational experiments in this project. Ahmed’s writing guided my curiosity toward the operational friction of physical encounters, and I used her concept of discomfort as a diagnostic tool to interrogate the boundaries of my own skin. Later in my research, her insights into how spaces extend some bodies while restricting others provided the language to articulate my considerations of safety and discomfort.

Ahmed's philosophy demands that we pay close attention to the physical labour of holding. It challenges us to examine therapeutic environments critically, asking whose bodies are inherently accommodated by the design, and whose bodies must continually bear the weight of not fitting.